Trump admin wants protester Facebook info

News you want to discuss. Threads should start with a reference or fact. Straight opinion is better housed in "The Lounge" below.
User avatar
Marie
Certified Fan
Posts: 31853
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:13 pm
Location: In front of my computer

Trump admin wants protester Facebook info

Postby Marie » Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:22 am

Bye-bye first amendment if they manage to make these warrants stick.

Dept of Justice seeking info on 6,000 people who ‘liked’ anti-Trump Facebook page
by Alberto Luperon
https://lawnewz.com
9/29/2017

THE ACLU-DC IS TRYING to stop three search warrants that would let the Department of Justice snoop around protesters’ Facebook accounts over Inauguration Day protests.

ACLU filed in D.C. Superior Court on Thursday, saying the government’s demands violate the Fourth Amendment because they are so broad and and that they threaten First Amendment speech. These warrants ask for too much information not directly relevant to the federal probe, argues the ACLU. This includes information on the plaintiffs’ friends, associates, and the approximately 6000 individuals who just “liked” an anti-Donald Trump Facebook page.

Requested data would go back to Nov. 1, 2016, a week before the presidential election.

“The warrants make no provision for avoiding or minimizing invasions into personal and associational/expression information, for preventing such information from being shared widely within the government, or for destroying irrelevant material when the investigation is concluded,” said the ACLU filing.

In other words, this might chill First Amendment speech by giving the government means to observe anyone who were simply linked to anti-Trump protesters.

This fight stems from arrests made Jan. 20. Demonstrators came to Washington D.C. to protest President Donald Trump‘s inauguration, and over 200 ended up getting charged with felony rioting. In investigating the alleged criminality, the federal government later got three search warrants from the D.C. Superior Court against three Facebook accounts: the disruptj20 page (now known as Resist This) owned by Emmelia Talarico, and personal accounts owned by Lacy MacAuley, and Legba Carrefour.

According to the ACLU, these people didn’t initially know about warrants because of a gag order. Facebook fought this gag order, which was later dropped by the government shortly before the D.C. Court of Appeals ruled on it. Talarico, MacAuley, and Carrefour hadn’t even been charged with Inauguration Day-related arrested by the US Attorney, said the ACLU.

The DOJ declined to comment.

The government previously tried to get their hands on the IP addresses of 1.3 million people who visited the DisruptJ20.org website. DreamHost, the hosting provider, was served a search warrant, which they fought in court. The August DOJ amended demand now omits the digital addresses of visitors and unpublished posts hosted on the site. A court took this further by placing more restrictions on investigators.

Officials must explain how information will be reviewed, show how they will abstain from collecting prohibited information, and abstain from sharing and publishing collected information, even with other government agencies. The DOJ is appealing these restrictions. DreamHost, who was ordered to hand over the information under this new court decision, was mulling over whether to appeal as well.

https://lawnewz.com/crazy/doj-seeking-i ... book-page/

-Marie-
You find out what someone is really like in "battle," and Olbermann is who you want to be in a foxhole with, Patrick said. "On the air, we had each others' backs," said Olbermann.
-David Goetzl: "Keith Olbermann, Dan Patrick still brothers long after ESPN's 'Big Show'"; MediaPost blog, 4-6-2012


Image

Return to “What Story Are YOU Talking About?”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests